8.2.5References

AUBR (2010), Assessing Europe’s University-Based Research – Expert Group on Assessment of University-Based Research. (2010). Research Policy. European Commission. doi:10.2777/80193

Biagioli M., Lippman A. eds. (2020), Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research, MIT Press. 

Bookstein A. (1997), Informetric distributions. III. Ambiguity and randomness. JASIS, 48(1), 2–10.

CoARA (2022), Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment. (Agreement on reforming research assessment pdf)

Curry, S., de Rijcke, S., Hatch, A. et al. (2020), The changing role of funders in responsible research assessment: progress, obstacles and the way ahead. Working Paper. Research on Research Institute (RoRI) 

Daraio, C., Glänzel, W. (2016). Grand challenges in data integration—State of the art and future perspectives: An introduction. Scientometrics, 108(1), 391-400.

Daraio, C., Glänzel, W. (2020). Selected essays of Henk F. Moed. Evaluative Informetrics: The Art of Metrics-Based Research Assessment: Festschrift in Honour of Henk F. Moed, 15-67.

Daraio C., Gorraiz J., Glänzel W. (2024), Towards a framework for the appropriate use of bibliometric indicators in research evaluation, STI 2024 Conference, 18-20 September 2024, Berlin (Germany), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14036242.

Daraio C., Glänzel W., Gorraiz, J., (2025a), Advancing Responsible Bibliometric Practices in Research Assessment, An Introduction to the ISSI 2025 Special Track (FRAME), In: Sh. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, G. Abramo (eds), Proceedings of the 20^th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025), held on 23-27 June 2025, Yerevan (Armenia). ISBN 978-9939-1-2086-7, pp. 3-5,  DOI: 10.51408/issi2025_159.

Daraio C., Gorraiz J., Glänzel W. (2025b), A Responsible Framework for an Appropriate Bibliometric-Based Research Assessment, In: Sh. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, G. Abramo (eds), Proceedings of the 20^th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025), held on 23-27 June 2025, Yerevan (Armenia). ISBN 978-9939-1-2086-7, p. 6–15. DOI: 10.51408/issi2025_160.

Daraio C., Maletta S. (2025), Understanding Responsible Research Assessment: A MacIntyrean Proposal, Acta Philosophica, International Journal of Philosophy, 1, 34, 173-188.

EU (2021), “Towards a reform of the research assessment system”, EU Scoping Report. ISBN 978-92-76-43463-4. Accessible at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/36ebb96c-50c5-11ec-91ac-01aa75ed71a1/language-en).

Glänzel, W. (2006), The perspective shift in bibliometrics and its consequences. Accessible at https://de.slideshare.net/inscit2006/the-perspective-shift-in-bibliometrics-and-its-consequences

Glänzel, W., Debackere, K. (2003), On the opportunities and limitations in using bibliometric indicators in a policy relevant context, In: R. Ball (Ed.), Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research: Applications, Benefits and Limitations, Forschungszentrum Jülich (Germany), 225–236.

Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1994), Little scientometrics, big scientometrics... and beyond? Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 375–384.

Gorraiz, J., Wieland, M., Ulrych, U., & Gumpenberger, C. (2020). De profundis: A decade of bibliometric services under scrutiny. Evaluative informetrics: The art of metrics-based research assessment: Festschrift in honour of Henk F. Moed, 233-260.

Gorraiz, J., Wieland, M., Gumpenberger, C. (2016). Individual bibliometric assessment@ University of Vienna: from numbers to multidimensional profiles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.08049.

Gumpenberger, C., Glänzel, W., & Gorraiz, J. (2016). The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score. Scientometrics, 108(2), 977-982.

Moed, H. F. (2007). The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), 575-583.

Moed, H. F., Halevi, G. (2015). Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 1988-2002.

Moed, H. F. (2017). Applied evaluative informetrics. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.

Moed, H. F. (2020). Appropriate use of metrics in research assessment of autonomous academic institutions. Scholarly assessment reports, 2(1): 1. DOI: 10.29024/sar.8

Robinson-Garcia, N., Vargas-Quesada, B., Torres-Salinas, D., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Gorraiz, J. (2024). Errors of measurement in scientometrics: classification schemes and document types in citation and publication rankings. Scientometrics, 1-21.

Torres-Salinas, D., Orduña-Malea, E., Delgado-Vázquez, Á., Gorraiz, J., & Arroyo-Machado, W. (2024). Foundations of Narrative Bibliometrics. Journal of Informetrics, 18(3), 101546.

Wilsdon, J., et al. (2015). The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. DOI: 10.4135/9781473978782

Wouters, P., Glänzel, W., Gläser, J., Rafols, I. (2013). The dilemmas of performance indicators of individual researchers–An urgent debate in bibliometrics. ISSI Newsletter, 9(3), 48-53